高级检索

中国煤炭行业双碳战略推进系统性评估——基于煤炭上市企业实践的fsQCA组态分析

Systematic evaluation of promoting the dual carbon strategy in China’s coal industry: A fsQCA configuration analysis based on the practices of coal listed enterprises

  • 摘要: 煤炭企业是我国能源生产主体,也是能源消耗大户。推进煤炭企业低碳发展与绿色转型是中国实施碳中和行动的关键环节,对促进煤炭高质量发展以及“双碳”目标实现具有重要意义。然而,对煤炭企业究竟采用哪些策略或技术来响应国家“双碳”战略一直缺少系统性评估。为此,本研究基于25家煤炭上市企业公开数据,采用fsQCA组态分析方法,探究经营规模、投入水平、技术创新和政策规范对企业碳排放强度下降的多元组态路径及差异性特征。研究表明:① 环保投资、研发人员等单一要素无法构成煤炭上市企业实现高水平碳减排效应的必要条件;② 煤炭上市企业碳减排存在5条组态路径,环保投资、研发投入占比和绿色专利数量作为核心条件介入多条组态路径,加大环保投资、研发投入及技术升级改造是当前降低煤炭企业碳强度的有效措施;③ 不同地区、不同规模煤炭上市企业碳减排效应组态存在显著差异。东部地区煤炭上市企业碳减排受环保投资和政策规范的共同影响;中部地区煤炭上市企业推进碳减排多为单一因素主导,其中政策规范驱动尤为突出;西部地区煤炭上市企业推进碳减排受环保投资和技术创新共同作用。巨型煤炭上市企业推进碳减排受环保投资、研发投入占比、技术创新和政策规范等多因素共同驱动;不考虑营业收入的作用,边缘条件综合作用也能够驱动大型煤炭上市企业实现碳减排,尤其是环保投资和研发投入占比;一般煤炭上市企业推进碳减排主要为环保投资驱动型。本研究系统梳理了煤炭上市企业应对“双碳”战略的复杂组态路径,为全行业绿色发展提供科学依据。

     

    Abstract: Coal enterprises are the main producers and consumers of energy in China. Promoting low-carbon development and green transformation of coal enterprises is a key link of carbon neutrality actions in China, which is of great significance for promoting coal high-quality development and achieving the "dual carbon" goals. However, there has been a lack of systematic assessment of the strategies or technologies adopted by coal companies in response to the "dual carbon" strategy. Therefore, based on the public data of 25 listed coal companies, this study uses a fsQCA configuration analysis method to explore the multiple configuration paths and differences of business scale, investment level, technological innovation and policy norms on the reduction of enterprise carbon emission intensity. The results show that: ① Single element, such as environmental protection investment and R&D personnel, cannot constitute the necessary conditions for listed coal companies to achieve high-level carbon emission reduction; ② There are five configuration paths for carbon emission reduction of listed coal enterprises, and environmental protection investment, the proportion of R&D investment and the number of green patents are the core conditions to intervene in multiple configuration paths, and increasing environmental protection investment, R&D investment and technological upgrading are effective measures to reduce the carbon intensity of coal enterprises; ③ There are significant differences in the configuration of carbon emission reduction effects of listed coal enterprises in different regions and scales. The carbon emission reduction of listed coal companies in the eastern region is affected by environmental protection investment and policy norms. The promotion of carbon emission reduction by listed coal companies in the central region is mostly dominated by a single factor, among which the policy normative drive is particularly prominent; The promotion of carbon emission reduction by listed coal enterprises in the western region is affected by the combined effect of environmental protection investment and technological innovation. The promotion of carbon emission reduction by giant listed coal companies is driven by multiple factors such as environmental protection investment, proportion of R&D investment, technological innovation and policy norms. Regardless of the role of operating income, the comprehensive effect of marginal conditions can also drive large listed coal companies to achieve carbon emission reduction, especially the proportion of environmental protection investment and R&D investment. In general, the carbon emission reduction promoted by listed coal companies is mainly driven by environmental protection investment. This study comprehensively sorts out the complex configuration path of coal leading enterprises to cope with the dual carbon strategy, and provides a scientific basis for the green development of the whole industry.

     

/

返回文章
返回