高级检索

    石墨尾矿高值化利用研究进展与环境效益评估:现状、挑战与展望

    Progress in the high-value utilization of graphite tailings and environmental benefit assessment: current status, challenges, and prospects

    • 摘要: 面向绿色矿山与双碳目标,基于现有研究与工程报道,系统梳理石墨尾矿的物性特征、传统利用与高值化方向,搭建由性质、工艺、性能、效益、风险构成的评估框架,并结合生命周期与碳足迹视角展开跨路径综述。结果显示:建材与土地工程具备规模消纳能力,但单位附加值与单位减排提升有限;功能材料与能源材料展现较高潜力,整体仍以小试与放大验证为主;酸性情景下的重金属淋溶与残余药剂迁移为关键环境风险,长期原位证据仍不足;产业化推进受标准衔接与示范工程稀缺等因素制约。在表格与图示的统一字段下开展可比性讨论,归纳适用边界与共性痛点,围绕代表性路径的工艺改性与性能影响进行归类比较,并在结论提出阶段化推进思路与应用场景要点。核心贡献在于提出并应用五维评估框架,整合分散证据,形成可用于工程筛选与政策研判的结构化认识。

       

      Abstract: Aiming at green mining and dual-carbon goals, based on existing research and engineering reports, the physical characteristics of graphite tailings, their traditional utilization, and high-value utilization directions are systematically reviewed. It establishes an assessment framework comprising characteristics, technology, performance, benefits, and risks, and conducts a cross-pathway review incorporating life cycle and carbon footprint perspectives. The results indicate that building materials and land engineering applications have large-scale consumption capacity but limited value-added benefits and emission reduction per unit. Functional materials and energy materials show higher potential, though development remains largely at the laboratory and pilot-scale verification stage. Heavy metal leaching and residual reagent migration under acidic conditions are identified as key environmental risks, with insufficient long-term in-situ evidence available. Industrialization advancement is constrained by factors such as standard alignment and a scarcity of demonstration projects. Under unified fields in tables and figures, comparable discussions are conducted, applicable boundaries and common challenges are summarized, process modifications and performance impacts of representative pathways are categorized and compared, and phased implementation strategies and key application scenarios are proposed in the conclusion. The contribution lies in proposing and applying a five-dimensional assessment framework, integrating scattered evidence to form a structured understanding applicable to engineering screening and policy analysis.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回